They came as prisoners
They were strange lads
Our superior wouldn’t like how much we laughed
They met the old lady
And she liked them too
It’s hard to believe some of the things that we do
We lied to their faces
Then took them outside
After the first shot I almost cried
They came as prisoners
We shot them dead
But in the end they were still our friends
My poem is meant to describe the events that occurred
in Guest of the Nation. Belcher and Hawkins were meant to be prisoners of war
held captive by Noble and Bonaparte but they all eventually grew to become very
good “chums”. Belcher always aided the old woman in the house even though
Hawkins resented her and the two of them along with Noble and Bonaparte played
cards together quite often. When intel was given to the guards that four of
their men had been shot by the enemy they had no choice but to eliminate
Belcher and Hawkins in retaliation. Bonaparte was never the same again. A major
topic in Guest of the Nation is brotherhood which I portrayed in my poem. The
beginning of my poem describes a happy relationship between the parties at hand
but at line 6 my poem hits a turning point, it starts to become dark and
miserable as the plot did in the actual story. It is also an accurate
reflection of Hawkins and Belcher’s feelings, the two were kept in the dark and
made to believe Noble and Bonaparte were their chums with Hawkins even claiming
“They aren’t the kind to shoot a pal!” unfortunately things took a turn for the
worst and Bonaparte and Noble met their untimely demise. A pathetic ending for
such a promising beginning. Was it right of Noble and Bonaparte to kill Hawkins
and Belcher or should they have found a way out to maintain their brotherhood?
There was no right or wrong decision. The decision was only right if they did it for the right reasons.
ReplyDelete